What it can see.
Each agent is scoped to the accounts, documents, and data it is authorized for. Role-based permissions and separation of duties are enforced inside the agent, not by the screen in front of it.
The Platform
r.Team is built with agents at the core — and fiduciary duty, ethics, compliance, cybersecurity, and advisory regulation are built into those agents, not wrapped around them.
The way modern edge networks were redesigned so agents could run at the center of the stack rather than bolted on at the edge, r.Team designs its agents so that trust, compliance, and security are how they reason — not a checklist they pass after the fact.
Each agent runs inside a loop with four gates, and every gate is a fiduciary control:
Each agent is scoped to the accounts, documents, and data it is authorized for. Role-based permissions and separation of duties are enforced inside the agent, not by the screen in front of it.
Agents produce proposals — a correction, a fee adjustment, an exception, a memo — never silent writes. Every proposal is a structured, reviewable object.
No proposal leaves an agent without its evidence: the governing document clause, the fee schedule line, the regulation, the prior decision. Uncited output is rejected by the loop itself.
Interpretive and judgment-level actions are routed to a named officer, counsel, or committee. The agent prepares; the human authorizes; the record shows both.
This is the difference between an assistant with a compliance layer and a fiduciary agent. One is checked afterward. The other cannot reason any other way.
One list. Used the same way on every page. Investment advisors use this layer with the trust team — see For Investment Advisors.
Shared context: instruments, firm policies, regulation, prior decisions. Agents do not carry a private view of the rules.
Compose governed agents from the Action Catalog. Each action declares what it may read, what it may propose, and where a human must stop it.
Learn more →One auditable doorway to systems of record. Read first. Write only after human approval.
Document intake, cited abstracts, human review gates. Abstracts cite. They do not conclude.
Learn more →Per-account hash chain. A public fingerprint only — never a client file.
How the record works →Conversational layer over existing systems. No rip-and-replace. Questions stay inside the same gates as every other agent.
Ontology Builder and Knowledge Graph are supporting blocks: they encode the firm’s vocabulary and relationships so the Reasoning Engine can cite them. Legal intelligence is a capability of Trust Intelligence and the Engine — not a separate product.
The Reasoning Engine is the shared context every agent reasons from: the governing instrument, the firm's own written policies, the applicable regulation, and the firm's prior decisions. Agents do not carry their own private view of the rules — they read from the same governed source your officers do.
Every conclusion is reproducible. The same inputs, policy version, and evidence yield the same proposal, and the record shows which version of each was in force. That is what makes the output defensible in an exam, an audit, or a dispute.
Compose agents that carry a job end to end — run the report, analyze it, draft the corrections, and stop for approval at every point your policy says a human must decide. See how a multi-step agent is built and governed.
Explore Agent StudioThe Bridge is how r.Team connects to the systems you already run — trust accounting, custody, CRM, document management — without replacing them. Agents read through the Bridge, propose through the Bridge, and, only after approval, write through the Bridge.
Because agents, workers, and integrations all run through one layer, observability is not something you add later. It comes with the architecture. One of the benefits of this convergence is that you start getting visibility into your inference traffic: which agent called which model, with what context, citing which documents, at what cost, and what it proposed as a result.
You do not have to trust the agents. You can watch them.
Duty of loyalty, prudence, and impartiality are constraints in the loop, not reminders in a manual. An agent cannot propose an action it cannot reconcile to the governing document and the beneficiaries' interests.
Conflicts of interest, self-dealing patterns, and undisclosed relationships are surfaced as first-class findings. The agent is required to flag, never to quietly proceed.
Firm policy, examiner expectations, and regulatory tests are versioned inside the Reasoning Engine. When a policy changes, every agent reasons from the new version on its next run — and the record shows the change.
Least privilege, scoped credentials, per-account isolation, and full logging are properties of the agent, not the network around it. Anomalous access and activity on an account are treated as fiduciary events.
For RIA and dual-registrant clients, the agent knows which actions are advice, which are administration, and which require disclosure — and routes accordingly.
01 · Bridge
Agents read from trust accounting, custody, CRM, and document management without writing back.
02 · Prove
Agents prove themselves against your live system before they are trusted to write to it. This is a platform control, not a conversion program.
03 · Authorize
Only after approval does an agent write through the Bridge, with the approval reference attached.
Two offers. One method. The r.Team platform overlays the systems you already run. It does not replace them. Parallel-Run Independence is the shared rule: run the new thing beside the old until evidence, not hope, authorizes the change. On the platform, that rule is a prove-before-write gate for agents. Leaving a vendor is a different product: the Parallel-Run Independence Playbook, a consulting engagement.
Proof, not promise
Every fiduciary event is written to a per-account hash chain. Only a fingerprint is published. No client file leaves the firm boundary.
Bring a redacted governing document and a month of fee and transaction activity. We will show you what the agents see, what they propose, what they cite, and where they stop for you.
Request a demo