Can
- Read within scope
- Run and analyze reports
- Draft corrections and memos
- Escalate exceptions
- Re-verify after approval
- Run on a schedule or on an event
Compose agents that carry a job from start to finish — and stop, by design, wherever a human must decide.
Agents that work while you sleep. Governance by design.
In Agent Studio, an agent is a governed sequence of actions drawn from the firm's Action Catalog. Each action declares what data it may read, what it may propose, what it must cite, and which review tier its output requires. An agent is composed from those actions; it inherits every constraint they carry.
A worked example of a multi-level agent — from report to correction to approval.
The agent pulls the month's fee accruals and the current fee schedules for every account in its scope through the Bridge, read-only.
The agent compares each accrual to the governing schedule and the trust instrument's fee clause, and classifies every variance: rounding, tier boundary, missing minimum, wrong schedule, or unexplained.
For each variance with a clear, cited cause, the agent drafts a correcting entry and a plain-language explanation. Unexplained variances are not corrected — they are escalated as exceptions.
Clerical corrections go to the account administrator; structural changes (a schedule swap) to a trust officer; anything touching the instrument's interpretation to counsel or committee. The reviewer approves, edits, or rejects each proposal — the agent cannot skip, batch past, or time out this gate.
Only approved entries are written back through the Bridge, one action type at a time, with the approval reference attached.
The agent re-runs step 1 against the corrected data, confirms the variances are resolved, and files a summary to the reviewer. Anything still open stays open — visibly.
Six steps, four evidence types, one human gate — and a record that shows all of it in order.
Not every action carries the same fiduciary weight. Routing follows tier, with escalation when policy requires it.
| Tier | Example action | Who approves | Can the agent write after approval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clerical | Rounding correction on a fee accrual | One reviewer, sampled for quality | Yes, with the approval reference |
| Structural | A schedule swap | Trust officer, single approval, full audit record | Yes, with the approval reference |
| Interpretive | Applying the instrument's fee clause to an ambiguous schedule | Trust officer plus fiduciary counsel — two people, never one | Yes, with the approval reference |
| Judgment | Any action that will drive a distribution, a tax election, or a concentration position | Committee action with written rationale on the record | Yes, with the approval reference |
Compare positions, cash, and accruals against expected states and surface discrepancies before the team arrives.
Human gate: structural exceptions to the account officer.
Watch for stale accounts, missing documentation, and elder financial exploitation patterns — anomalous distributions, changed payment instructions, unusual access.
Human gate: interpretive findings to officer and counsel.
Guide conversion steps, validate mappings, and produce audit-ready progress reports under Parallel-Run Independence.
Human gate: cutover authorization by the named officer.
Propose cited governing terms from the instrument against what the system of record holds, and flag disagreements.
Human gate: interpretive terms to counsel; judgment terms to committee.
We start with one report your team already runs by hand.
Request a demo